KDE-Forum.org

I agree with most of your suggestions about a fork of KDE3, and just for the sake of revitalizing the 3.5 era konqueror would in itself be good enough justification. The point you make about a fork diminishing the bad feeling from some folks about the path of KDE4 could be spot on. Most people seem to be happy with the direction of KDE4 but there is OBVIOUSLY a subset of KDE users who are not happy with KDE4, regardless how politically incorrect it may be to suggest such a thing, and are stickin...

Quoted Originally posted by AVonGauss Thanks for the suggestion, but unfortunately Thunderbird would only handle my needs as far as regular e-mail, but not contacts or scheduling. Not that it really matters, but I'm actually using a good old fashion POP server to receive e-mail. Well you could probably solve most of your problem if you organised yourself an IMAP email account and used Kmail for most of your needs, move those F500 HTML emails into a custom folder, then fire up Thunderbird just t...

Quoted Originally posted by AVonGauss The client I am referring to is a Fortune 500 company - some of their execs may act like kids or even big babies sometimes, but HTML definitely has business purposes. Presumably you are using IMAP, as a business user, so then consider using Thunderbird for this class of client. Or, do them a favour and deliberately use plan text replies to demonstrate how silly their gawdy HTML emails are. I would rather the limited developer time spent on Kmail go towards ...

Quoted Originally posted by alienwithin When you have such feature rich e-mail programs on both windows and apple, I would see it as pointless for any apple or windows user to use kmail. Your definition of "feature rich" and mine obviously differ. I don't use HTML email because I simply abhor the inevitable crap that most people include when using HTML, I don't want that kind of crap in my mailbox thank you very much, and receiving and sending messages is so much faster when using plain text. T...