You are not logged in.

41

Friday, September 12th 2008, 7:29pm

OK, let's be realistic. This objection to anything except plain text emails is really only elitist, inverted snobbery. Sorry to be so brutal - but information presentation is very important in all fields. Early typographers would be astonished by someone claiming to prefer plain text. How well information is presented is a major factor in how it is understood.
Please, please let us move on and allow KMail to realise its potential.
If we are going to use religious words like "right" and "wrong" in describing improved HTML support then I wish to "Amen" the above. I may or may not want or even like HTML email. I may even think it is "wrong". That is not the point. I need HTML email. The current limits make it impossible to adopt KMail in a business environment. Until it fully supports HTML (Send, Receive, Forward and Reply with a rich set of editing tools) it will be a tool for home hobbyists and and elitists that feel the world should turn around them. It needs HTML support to move from "toy" to "tool" status.

seekyou

Unregistered

42

Thursday, September 18th 2008, 9:02am

I guess keeps kmail rather ugly and anal retensive with secruity. It's also a view that needs to change if the linux community wants to grow, wants to convince windows users to switch to linux.